The Bible vs the Bible. Which one are you reading?

 After you read this post you may end up asking this question.  Why did the people who publish these Bibles leave out so many scriptures or change the verses which end up down grading the Lord?

Lastchroniclesfirelogo

“The Last Chronicle of Planet Earth” October 11, 2011 Edition is now ready for you to download for free. Please note, the download may take some time to download but it will come up. The speed will depend on your computer.

Download The Last Chronicles of Planet Earth October 11, 2011 Edition by Frank DiMora

ARE YOU READING THE TRUE BIBLE?

 Yvonne DiMoraby Yvonne DiMora

As Frank DiMora's sister-in-law, I have subscribed to his last-days prophecy posts for a few years now. They have been an informational, power-packed blessing to me and others, seeing how the dominoes are all falling into place that are in Revelation and other prophetic books of the Bible. I feel an urgency to let people know that the Bible they may be reading may not be the authorized version that has been directly translated from the earlier, original manuscripts. Many important verses have been changed in meaning or just left out!

I had always read the NIV translation of the Bible throughout the years, because it seemed easier to understand. During one of my studies, I stumbled across an article about how the NIV translation of the Bible was missing 40 verses, compared to the King James translation. I went to my NIV to compare verses to see if that was true and was shocked to see that it was! I asked myself, why would the Bible publishers do that?

When I tried to find the listed verses in my NIV translation, they were missing, either in the body of scripture, or in the footnotes.

When you read your Bible do you check the footnotes after every verse? Do you say to yourself "I am reading verse 3, so let me look below and see if something in verse 3 is missing."? Even if you did do that (which you probably don't) the footnotes say that the "best manuscripts" don't have the verse–will you then agree with them that the verse doesn't belong?

Not all of the word deletions are found in the footnotes of the NIV, so don't assume they will let you know all of the changes they've made. The next step will be for the NIV to just omit the footnotes and re-number everthing. As an example, verse 38 would become verse 37 so it wouldn't look funny. Instead, it would become a paragraph style instead of a verse format, so they can hide the deletions and no one would notice. The NIV may go that way eventually. They are desensitizing you to the changing of the very words of

God.

I never noticed that they had skipped verses in these chapters of my Bible. Here are some of the omitted verses that the NIV is missing, and some of them are very important ones:

Matthew 12:47

– removed in the footnotes

Matthew 17:21

– COMPLETELY removed. What are the NIV readers missing? "For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost."

Matthew 21:44-

removed in the footnotes

Matthew 23:14-

COMPLETELY removed. What are the NIV readers missing? "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore, ye shall receive the greater damnation."

Mark 7:16-

COMPLETELY removed. What are the NIV readers missing? "If any man have ears to hear, let him hear."

Mark 9:44 and 46-

COMPLETELY removed. What are the NIV readers missing? "Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched."

 

Mark 11:26-

COMPLETELY removed. What are the NIV readers missing? "But if ye do not forgive, neither will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses."

Mark 15:28-

COMPLETELY removed. What are the NIV readers missing? "And the scripture was fulfilled, which saith, And he was numbered with the transgressors."

Mark 16:9-20 (all 12 verses!)-

There is a line separating the last 12 verses of Mark from the main text. Right under the line it says: [The two most reliable early manuscripts do not have Mark 16:9-20] (NIV, 1978 ed.)

Luke 9:55-56-

Part of verse 55 and part of verse 56 were left out. What are the NIV readers missing? "Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of. For the Son of man is not come to destroy men's lives, but to save them."

Luke 17:36-

COMPLETELY removed. What are the NIV readers missing? "Two men shall be in the field; the one shall be taken and the other left."

Luke 22:44-

removed in the footnotes.

Luke 22:43-

removed in the footnotes

Luke 23:17-

COMPLETELY removed. What are the NIV readers missing? "For an angel went down at a certain season into the pool, and troubled the water: whosoever then first after the troubling of the water stepped in was made whole of whatsoever disease he had."

John 7:53-8:11-

removed in the footnotes

Acts 3:13-

Jesus is called a servant instead of the Son of God.

Acts 8:37-

COMPLETELY removed. It's deletion makes one think that people can be baptized only and be saved, without believing on the Lord Jesus Christ. What are the NIV readers missing? "And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the son of God."

Acts 15:34-

COMPLETELY removed. What are the NIV readers missing? "But the chief captain Lysias came upon us, and with great violence took him away out of our hands."

Acts 28:29-

COMPLETELY removed. What are the NIV readers missing? "And when he had said these words, the Jews departed, and had great reasoning among themselves."

Romans 16:24-

COMPLETELY removed. What are the NIV readers missing? "The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen."

1 John 5:7-

This is an extremely important verse about the Trinity. It was COMPLETELY removed:

The NIV says: "For there are three that testify."

The KJV says: "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one."

 

Another disturbing issue between the two translations is about the Morning Star. It was confusing, as I had read two different versions, one was Jesus and the NIV says it is satan in Isaiah 14:12. The NIV says in that verse:

"How you have fallen from heaven, morning star, [the morning star is Jesus, not the devil]son of the dawn! You have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid low the nations!

As I recall, it was satan or Lucifer that was cast down out of heaven. Not Jesus. They are basically calling Jesus the devil in this verse. This is how it should read, according to the KJV version:

"How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! [not morning star] how art thou cut down to the ground, which did weaken the nations!"

Other verses referring to the morning star being Jesus are:

Rev. 2:28- "And I will give him the morning star."

Rev. 22:16- "I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star." Jesus says it, himself, that he is the morning star!

 

 

As if that isn't enough to make you want to switch to the KJV Bible, there is one other problem with the NIV translation. And, once again, it is a very important one. This issue has to do with Jesus being the chief cornerstone. But in one NIV verse, he is called the capstone. That is quite a different function altogether. A cornerstone lays the foundation. Without it, the building would fall. Whereas, a capstone is a dressing, or ornament. Just form, no function. Here is the verse in the NIV:

1Peter 2:6-7

– "For in scripture it says: "See, I lay a stone in Zion, a chief and precious cornerstone, and the one who trusts in him will never be put to shame." Now to you who believe, this stone is precious. But to those who do not believe, "The stone the builders rejected has become the capstone."

Hmm, that's odd, isn't it? Because in verse 6, the NIV calls Jesus 'a chosen and precious cornerstone…' Why would they not call both of them a cornerstone? The KJV does. Here it is in that version:

1 Peter 2:6-7

– "Wherefore also it is contained in the Scripture, Behold I lay in Zion a chief cornerstone, elect, precious: and he that believeth on him shall not be confounded. Unto you therefore which believe he is precious: but unto them which be disobedient, the stone which the builders disallowed, the same is made the head of a corner [or cornerstone]."

 

The shed blood of Jesus is one of the most important foundations to the Christian's faith.

In the KJV, 1 Col. 13, 14 says: "Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son. In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins."

Can we be saved without the shed blood of Jesus? I guess the NIV publishers didn't think so…

The NIV version of 1 Col. 13, 14 says, "For he has rescued us from the dominion of darkness and brought us into the kingdom of the Son he loves, in whom we have redemption, the forgiveness of sins." Where's the blood of Jesus?

I did some research on why these omittances occurred over and over again. I discovered was that the publishing company, Zondervan, is owned by parent company, Harper Collins. Harper Collins publishes The Satanic Bible, The Joy of Gay Sex and the NIV Bible. Rupert Murdoch owns these companies. He also owns Newscorp, a huge propaganda machine.

It seems like a conflict of interest, spiritually, printing the Word of God as well as the Satanic Bible. They seem to be watering down the power of the Word and deceiving the readers with those translations.

If you research all of the new translations, you will find many discrepancies in them, as well. . The New King James Version has many discrepancies as well as the NAS, RSV and the ASV. In my opinion, I feel it's best to stick to the authorized King James Version

Why would they do that?

When a publisher prints a new version of the Bible, it has to be a little different, in order to copyright it. So they have to delete or add to, in order to sell lots of new Bibles. There are so many Bibles now with different themes and designs to cater to anyone.

There seems to be an underlying goal of demeaning Jesus and the power of His blood. Without His blood, we don't have redemption for our sins. We have to be careful to make sure we are reading the truth of the Word. But don't take my word for it, do your own research on this. All you have to do is Google the subject and go to YouTube and there are many posts and videos on it.

Hosea 4:6

says "My people are destroyed for a lack of knowledge." Don't be destroyed by a watered-down version of the Word of God. Read the Bible that has the power. The authorized King James version.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.